Archives

CATEGORY:  Topics » Wireless Control

IEC Publishes New Ultra-Low Power Consumption Wireless Technology Standard

The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has ratified a new standard–ISO/IEC 14543-3-10–for wireless applications with ultra-low power consumption pioneered by EnOcean. The standard can be downloaded from www.iso.org.

The new standard is geared to wireless sensors and wireless sensor networks with ultra-low power consumption. It also includes sensor networks that utilize energy harvesting technology to draw energy from their surroundings–for example, from motion, light or temperature differences. This principle enables electronic control systems to be used that work independently of an external power supply.

Specifically, it covers OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) layers 1-3, being the physical, data link and networking layers. The full title of the standard is: ISO/IEC 14543-3-10 Information technology–Home Electronic Systems (HES)–Part 3-10: Wireless Short-Packet (WSP) protocol optimized for energy harvesting–Architecture and lower layer protocols.

International standardization will accelerate the development and implementation of energy-optimized wireless sensors and wireless sensor networks. It will also open up new markets and areas of application for energy harvesting solutions. In addition to the already established markets for home and building technology, there will be further uses ranging from the smart home, smart metering and the smart grid to solutions for industry, logistics and transport.

Members of the EnOcean Alliance have already introduced more than 850 EnOcean-based, interoperable products, all of which comply with the new standard. Developers and manufacturers can therefore benefit from the Alliance’s extensive practical experience, huge product range and installed base, and many years of user education.

Bilevel Stairwell Lighting Promises Up to 70-80 Percent Energy Savings

Stairwells account for about 2% of multistory commercial building floorspace, with an average of one light fixture for each 58 sq.ft. of stairwell, according to the International Facility Management Association. It is trafficked 3-5% of the average day.

This application has emerged as a strong potential opportunity for energy-saving controls. In the near future, in fact, using energy-saving controls in this space will become standard practice due to commercial building energy code requirements.

Although the average stairwell is occupied infrequently and for short periods of time, many building codes require constant illumination for safety.

The Life Safety Code (NFPA 101) requires at least 10 footcandles of light on the stair tread while in use (Section 7.8.1.3). The use of automatic motion sensors is recognized as long as they provide fail-safe operation, turn the lights on upon occupancy, and keep the lights ON for at least 15 minutes after the space becomes unoccupied (Section 7.8.1.2.2).

Lutron Electronics, Lithonia, Philips Day-Brite, Philips Lightolier, LaMar Lighting and Columbia Lighting and other manufacturers now offer stairwell light fixtures with a dimming or switching controller, allowing energy savings to be captured in this application. The fixture operates at a constant low light level (energy-saving mode)—e.g., about 1 footcandle. When an integral or separately mounted occupancy sensor detects that a person has entered the space, it signals the controller to raise light level to code-compliant full brightness (occupied mode)—e.g., 10 footcandles. Some products provide complete shutoff capability for when codes allow it.

Image courtesy of LaMar Lighting.

The result is up to 70-80% energy savings, say manufacturers. The energy savings may have two components: first, the existing fixture may be T12 and replaced with a more-efficient electronic-ballasted T8, T5 or T5HO (or LED) fixture. And second, the occupancy sensor ensures the lights maintain a lower light level during the majority of the time the stairwell is unoccupied.

A 2003 Lighting Research Center study in two new York City buildings demonstrated 53-60% energy savings using this approach. A later Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory study in four California buildings demonstrated 40-60% energy savings. And a Pacific Gas & Electric study at The Fillmore Center in San Francisco demonstrated 66% energy savings.

Stairwell fixtures are available in various lamp lengths and wattages; white or clear prismatic lens; and wall or ceiling mounting. The controller may offer step dimming (single ballast), continuous dimming (single ballast) or bilevel switching (two ballasts) capability, with a choice of low-end light level. The occupancy sensor is either mounted as a part of the fixture or separately with wireless communication between the sensor and the controller, and detects occupancy via passive-infrared (PIR) or ultrasonic technology. Adjustable time delay and emergency battery backup options are typically available. Some products contain a light sensor that maintains the low light level setting during occupancy if there is a high enough light level on the stairs due to daylight contribution from windows and skylights.

The challenge is to ensure that the lights raise to full output during occupancy, a function of avoiding sensor “blind spots” and ensuring the sensor is sensitive enough to raise light output immediately upon occupancy. If using a PIR sensor, note that the sensor must have a line of sight between the sensor and the occupant, and is most sensitive to people moving laterally in front of the sensor. Ultrasonic sensors are more sensitive, do not require a line of sight, and are most sensitive to people moving to and from the sensor. Wireless sensors enable more flexibility in placement, as they are not tied to a specific fixture location.

The Lutron PowPak Stairwell Fixture, for example, uses a Lutron digital continuous dimming ballast preprogrammed to occupied and unoccupied levels, while offering field programming. The fixture receives signals from Lutron’s Radio Powr Savr wireless occupancy sensors via the company’s Clear Connect radio-frequency technology. In this solution, the wireless sensor provides flexibility in placement, ensuring adequate coverage. It raises light level not only for the fixture in the immediate area, but also the floor above and the floor below, providing a relatively seamless experience for the occupant.

Image courtesy of Lutron Electronics.

Energy code standards are beginning to mandate this approach. Section 9.4.1.6(g) of the ASHRAE/IES 90.1-2010 energy standard—the minimum standard for all commercial building energy codes by October 18, 2013 per Department of Energy ruling—lighting in stairwells must “have one or more control devices to automatically reduce lighting power in any one controlled zone by at least 50% within 30 minutes of all occupants leaving that controlled zone.”

Bilevel stairwell lighting offers a simple method of saving energy in new construction and retrofit applications.

LCA TV: Jim Frey of Sylvania Talks The Future Of Lighting At GreenBuild 2010

At GreenBuild 2010, Jim Frey of OSRAM SYLVANIA talks about the future of lighting, highlighting the EMerge DC Building Power Standard, LED general lighting, OLEDs and wireless controls.

Wireless Lighting Controls Offer Flexibility And Cost Savings in Commercial Buildings

Leviton wireless control

Image courtesy of Leviton.

Radio-frequency (RF) wireless communication is a significant emerging lighting control technology. In a typical hardwired lighting control system, control signals are sent using communication wires. In a wireless RF system, control devices communicate through the air using radio waves, eliminating the need for control wiring. The resulting advantages enable advanced lighting control with greater installation flexibility and lower labor installation cost, ideal for hard-to-wire applications non-accessible ceilings, hard ceilings, asbestos abasement issues, and brick and mortar existing buildings.

Wireless RF lighting control first became popularized in residential applications, with typical applications including home theater, kitchens and other common areas, master bedrooms and exterior and security lighting. In recent years, however, wireless RF lighting control has emerged as a viable alternative to hardwired controls in commercial building applications. What benefits does RF wireless communication provide?

The first benefit is flexibility. Wireless control devices can be placed where they are needed without limitation imposed by wiring, including areas that are difficult to wire. More flexibility is provided in unique applications. Electrical planning may be shortened. After installation, devices can be moved and the system expanded with relative ease.

The second benefit is labor and material cost savings, which may result in net installation savings after the typically higher product cost is figured. Wireless control eliminates the need for dedicated control wiring and associated switch legs, traveler wires and other raw materials. The system installs more quickly, producing labor savings. With no damage to walls or ceilings, and little to no disruption to business operations, wireless control lends itself well to existing building applications demanding the benefits of advanced lighting control.

Leviton

Image courtesy of Leviton.

The advantages of wireless control make these solutions particularly suitable for commercial building applications where the cost of running control wires is too costly or simply not possible, such as outdoor lighting, parking garages, warehouses and retrofits.

RF Control Systems

Wireless RF control devices for commercial applications include occupancy sensors, photosensors, low-voltage relay switches, line-voltage controls, plug controls, hotel card switches, shade controls, HVAC and valve controllers, door/window sensors. Despite similarities between products, various manufacturers may take significantly different approaches.

In the simplest wireless RF system, a sensor, such as an occupancy sensor, communicates to a controller that controls the load, such as a wall switch with embedded RF receiver, using radio waves instead of wiring. The level of communication is peer to peer—two devices communicating within range. To extend the range, a repeater is required.

Wireless control devices may be powered by batteries or through energy harvested from the operating environment. High-quality batteries offer a rated life of 10 years. Self-powered devices are available using EnOcean’s wireless RF technology. For example, the simple motion of pressing a light switch harvests a sufficient amount of energy to send a control signal to a receiver. Sensors are powered by ambient light or via temperature differences. Hotel key card systems are powered by the motion of the placement of the card into the device.

wireless RF products

Image courtesy of Ledalite.

Image courtesy of Ledalite.

Mesh Networking

More sophisticated control needs, involving a greater complexity of loads and integration of multiple control strategies, will involve larger systems such as mesh networks. In a mesh network, control signals are passed along, or routed among, all of the wireless devices that make up the system, or network nodes, providing multiple, redundant pathways for signals to get to their intended receiver(s). As such, repeaters are not necessary. In a typical system, each device is connected via at least two pathways. If two-way communication is enabled, devices can acknowledge receipt and request retransmission of data, enhancing reliability.

mesh networking

Image courtesy of Zensys.

Communication of a robust control signal is therefore enabled via the most efficient path between devices that have no direct path to each other or are out of range. This approach makes it possible for devices with relatively low transmitting power to communicate reliably over long distances. Mesh networks are “self healing,” meaning if one of the devices is not functioning, the signal simply routes through another functioning device. This type of configuration is easily scalable. Note that configuring a mesh network is more difficult than a non-mesh network. And the selected solution should include a method for locating and identifying devices for installation, operations and maintenance.

Protocols

For wireless RF control devices to be interoperable within a given control system, they must be compatible with the same protocol. Today, there are four main types of RF communication protocols: ZigBee, Z-Wave, EnOcean and proprietary.

ZigBee is an open-source protocol (IEEE 802.15.4) that is supported by the ZigBee Alliance of manufacturers. Vendors offering products based on the 2.4 GHz ZigBee platform include Sensor Switch, Crestron and Control4. ZigBee enables complex control functions and mesh and star networking configurations.

Z-Wave was developed by Zensys, a home controls manufacturer, and is shared with partnering companies through the Z-Wave Alliance, making this protocol a de facto open standard. Vendors offering products on the 900 MHz Z-Wave platform include Leviton, Cooper Wiring Devices and Intermatic.

EnOcean technology was developed by EnOcean and is shared with partnering companies through the EnOcean Alliance, making this protocol another de facto open standard. Manufacturers offering self-powered products based on the 315 MHz EnOcean platform include Leviton, Ledalite Architectural Products, Illumra and Zumtobel.

Some manufacturers develop proprietary protocols unique to their products operating as part of an engineered system. Manufacturers include Vantage Controls (900 MHz), WattStopper (900 MHz) and Lutron Electronics (400 MHz).

Image courtesy of Leviton.

Range

Wireless RF control devices in a network communicate with a radio range of 30-100 ft., more or less depending on whether the signal must travel through open space or obstacles such as dense walls. Range can be extended by adding devices, either repeaters or additional control devices in a network. Passing the signal through obstructions can impact range; the range given by a manufacturer as “open air” distance is not the same as what will occur in a structure.

Not just physical obstructions such as walls, but the type of material in the obstruction—steel, wood, brick, cement, etc.—will affect range. Installation in metal enclosures such as a metal junction box with a stainless steel faceplate will similarly affect range. Finally, range may be dependent on what protocol is used; the EnOcean Alliance, for example, claims a range of 50-150 ft. (through walls and ceilings). A device such as an RF signal strength meter (“sniffer”) should be used to check locations for these devices prior to installation.

Startup

Control devices in a wireless lighting control system work together in much the same way they would in a wired system. What is different is the way in which the devices interact and the level of intelligence required. In a hardwired system, the devices intended to work together can be simply wired. In a wireless system, the devices must be programmed or mapped to each other so they know to which control signals they should be responsive, and how they should respond. Additional intelligence is not new; it has been deployed in networked lighting systems for some time.

Along with the flexibility of wireless lighting controls comes some added complexity. Important questions to ask include how the devices are set up and commissioned, and by whom. It is recommended that programming be performed prior to physical installation, as the operating range is reduced during programming. It is further recommended that the wired receiver device be installed first and then the wireless device programmed within 10 ft. to ensure mapping.

Integration

While wireless RF control systems may be standalone, wireless devices may also supplement, expand or otherwise interface with an existing control system.

The wireless RF solution may be required to integrate with the hardwired lighting control system as well as other building monitoring and control systems such as BACnet, LONworks, Modbus, DALI and TCP/IP (Internet). Additionally, it may also be required to operate with other wireless control devices. Selected devices should not interfere with each other, should be FCC certified, and should be secure from intrusion. EnOcean modules, for example, contain a unique 32-bit ID number to prevent overlap with other wireless controls. Additionally, some wireless controls also use 128-bit Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) security for communications.

Wireless Expands Lighting Control

RF wireless lighting controls are growing in popularity both as a more flexible alternative to hardwired systems in new construction and as an economical way to retrofit existing spaces with minimal cost and disruption.

More information:

See LCA’s new online course on wireless lighting controls here.

See Lutron’s offering of wireless controls here.

See Leviton’s offering of wireless controls here.

See WattStopper’s offering of wireless controls here.