Archives

CATEGORY:  Topics » Rules and Regulations

New York City Requires Lighting Upgrades in Largest Buildings

People live and work in more than one million buildings in New York City. These buildings consume $15 billion in energy each year and produce 75% of the City’s carbon emissions.

To help achieve the PlaNYC goal of a 30% reduction in greenhouse gases by the year 2030, on December 9, 2009, the New York City Council enacted ambitious legislation targeting energy consumption in buildings. Recognizing that 85% of the buildings that exist today will still be in use in 2030, the Council is focusing on existing buildings. New York’s 22,000 largest buildings, concentrated largely in Manhattan, account for roughly 45% of total floorspace and energy consumption, and were specifically targeted by the legislation to make the biggest impact for the smallest amount of government intervention.

Int. No. 476 requires large building owners to make an annual benchmark analysis of energy consumption so that owners, tenants and potential tenants can compare buildings’ energy consumption.

Int. No. 967 requires large private buildings to conduct energy audits once every 10 years and implement energy-efficient maintenance practices. City-owned buildings larger than 10,000 sq.ft. must conduct audits and complete energy-efficient retrofits that pay for themselves within seven years.

Int. No. 564 creates a New York City Energy Code that existing buildings must meet when they conduct renovations, closing the loophole that allows building systems to perpetuate non-compliant systems if they perform renovations on less than half of a given building system.

And Int. 973 requires large commercial buildings to upgrade their lighting. Specifically, the law applies to buildings larger than 50,000 sq.ft., buildings combining with other buildings on the same tax lot to exceed 100,000 sq.ft. in total, and buildings held in the condominium form of ownership governed by the same board of managers and together exceed 100,000 sq.ft. in total.

The law defines a lighting upgrade as meeting the minimum requirements of the New York City Energy Conservation Code. Exceptions include residential living spaces; spaces serving these living spaces such as laundry rooms, boiler rooms and hallways, stairways and corridors used for egress; emergency or security areas; assembly spaces in houses of worship; and lighting that meets code installed on or after July 1, 2010. The code itself has its own exceptions.

The New York City Energy Conservation Code is based on the New York State energy code, with amendments making it more stringent. The lighting section of the Code includes mandatory and prescriptive requirements for lighting controls (interior lighting controls, light level reduction controls and automatic lighting shutoff), tandem wiring, exit signs, interior lighting power caps and exterior lighting.

To demonstrate compliance, the owner must file a report with the New York City Department of Buildings, prepared by a registered design professional or a licensed master or special electrician, certifying that the lighting upgrade has been completed and that the work is in compliance with the technical standards of the New York City electrical code.

Another provision in this law requires these buildings to submeter tenant spaces larger than 10,000 sq.ft. and provide this information to the tenants, including monthly statements of electricity consumption and costs.

Critics of the legislation say building owners have too long to upgrade their lighting and that it lacks a mechanism forcing them to do it. Proponents of the legislation welcome what is arguably the country’s most ambitious initiative to increase the energy efficiency of existing buildings, where energy efficiency measures can have the biggest impact.

Fluorescent Magnetic T12 Ballast Phaseout: It’s Time to Upgrade Existing Lighting and Control Systems

Last month, we covered regulations covering fluorescent ballasts that have essentially eliminated the magnetic T12 ballast with few exceptions, including F40T12, F96T12 and F96T12HO ballasts for both full-wattage and energy-saving versions of these lamps.

Two years later, in 2012, additional regulations will take effect, creating new energy standards for selected linear T5, T8 and T12 lamps. The net result, with few exceptions, is a majority of 4-ft. linear and 2-ft. U-shaped T12, many 8-ft. T12 and T12HO, and some low-color-rendering 4-ft. T8 lamps will be eliminated.

Based on these facts, one could make a simple argument that it is now time to upgrade existing lighting and control systems to improve energy efficiency and lighting quality.

Replace individually or in a planned upgrade?

A basic choice will be whether to replace the existing T12 lighting system all at once in a planned upgrade or replace individual components as they fail.

At first glance, replacing individual components as they fail appears to be the easiest path forward as it avoids the upfront cost of equipment and installation labor and potential disruption of a renovation.

However, a planned upgrade presents several major advantages:

  • good lighting performance, uniformity and space appearance by switching from T12 to T8 all at once, avoiding confusion resulting from maintaining two incompatibility lamp and ballast types in inventory; and most importantly:
  • higher energy savings and greater lighting quality resulting from reevaluating the existing lighting system and upgrading it to current best practices. Once a decision is made to upgrade the lighting system, the owner has taken control of the situation and can maximize the benefit of the new lighting.

The biggest energy-saving and lighting quality opportunities are in:

  • older, overlighted buildings that use older technologies such as T12 systems
  • where utility costs are very high; and
  • where lighting is uncontrolled and left ON all night.

T12 systems, for example, can be upgraded to realize energy savings as high as 50% or more in offices, classrooms and other applications, according to the National Lighting Bureau.

Retrofit or redesign?

The next basic choice facing the facility manager is whether to retrofit or redesign. In a retrofit, new lamps and ballasts are installed in existing fixtures and existing controls replaced. In a redesign, the fixtures themselves may be replaced or moved.

Good lighting quality accounts for factors such as visual comfort, glare, uniformity, color rendering, lighting on walls and ceilings, and harsh patterns, shadows and flicker. If the building’s primary spaces have been retasked to new purposes for which the existing lighting system provides insufficient lighting conditions, or uniformity is poor, or there is little light on walls and ceilings, or there are obvious, unaddressed sources of glare, and if occupants are unhappy with their lighting, then the space may benefit from a redesign.

The owner may benefit prior to the upgrade by simply asking occupants—the people who use the lighting regularly—whether they are satisfied with their lighting, what their lighting problems are, and what they want.

Lamps and ballasts

Energy-efficient lighting technologies have had decades to develop and so many good, reliable solutions are now available from manufacturers.

Regarding lamps and ballasts, consider T8 systems. There are now 23W, 25W, 28W, 32W (normal output) and 32W (high output, or “Super T8”) T8 lamps available offering a choice of power and light output.

There are also electronic ballasts available with a range of efficiencies and ballast factors enabling further tuning of light output. The most efficient ballasts carry the NEMA Premium mark on the ballast label. Dimmable ballasts are becoming more efficient, versatile and affordable, making dimmable general lighting a reality.

Regarding fixtures, consider T5 systems, direct/indirect lighting and, if recessed, volumetric-distribution fixtures that place some light on walls to eliminate the “cave effect” common with some parabolic fixtures. LED lighting offers exciting opportunities to dramatically improve efficiency but as the overall technology is still relatively new, owners should proceed with caution, particularly when confronted by options such as LED T8 lamp replacements, which have not faired well in independent product testing at the Department of Energy.

Lighting controls

According to the New Buildings Institute, advanced lighting controls can generate up to 50% lighting energy savings in existing buildings. Effective strategies include automatic shutoff, light reduction control, daylight harvesting and demand response.

The biggest challenge to incorporating advanced control strategies to an existing building is adding low-voltage control wiring, generally limiting opportunities for installation of sophisticated control systems. As a result, the simplest upgrade options involve the least amount of rewiring or simply swapping out older ballasts and controls for new controls.

lighting upgrades

The easiest controls retrofit involves replacing components with the least amount of rewiring. While this often leads to occupancy sensors and lighting panelboard upgrades, new wireless controls and the falling cost of dimming ballasts are expanding the potential role for lighting control in building upgrades. Photo courtesy of WattStopper.

The first lighting control strategy to consider is automatic shutoff. It is considered the easiest, lowest-risk path to energy savings and is relatively simple to set up and commission. If LEED (for existing buildings) is used as a model path or actual requirement for the upgrade, this will be essential, as LEED requires that buildings meet the ASHRAE 90.1 energy standard as a prerequisite to gaining points for transcending it.

Start at the lighting panel. Are there large, open spaces in the building with predictable hours of operation? Are there public spaces where the lights must stay ON even when a space is unoccupied? If so, consider upgrading the existing lighting panelboard to an intelligent lighting control panel that offers programmable scheduling. Be sure to give local users override capability with a maximum 2- to 4-hour override.

Next, consider replacing the wall switch. Are there smaller, enclosed spaces in the building that are intermittently occupied during the day and are lighted with instant-ON light sources? If so, consider replacing toggle wall switches with occupancy sensors. If there is a clear line of sight between the switch and the primary task area, PIR sensors can present a cost-effective option. If greater sensitivity is needed for small levels of motion or if there are obstacles between the wall switch and the task, consider ultrasonic. For the ultimate in reliability, consider dual-technology sensors.

If the space is a private office already circuited for bilevel switching, consider replacing the manual switches with a manual-ON/auto-OFF occupancy sensor for the highest positive energy savings and some flexibility. If the space requires an occupancy sensor be installed in a location other than at the wall switch, consider wireless occupancy sensors that run on batteries or ambient light in the space harvested using an integral solar cell. These sensors install anywhere within range of the receiver switch, which replaces the wall switch, and present no wiring requirements, although wireless technology is presently a premium option. Similarly, wireless photosensors are also available.

If the upgrade involves replacing light fixtures, consider integral controls. In a workstation-specific open office lighting layout, for example, direct/indirect fixtures can be installed that include an integral occupancy sensor and/or, if placed in a daylight zone, a photosensor and dimmable ballast, with the control wiring located inside the fixture. If the space is a hibay lighting application where metal halide is being replaced by fluorescent fixtures, consider fixture-integrated or mounted line-voltage occupancy sensors, which can be an economical addition to a new fluorescent fixture or separate add-on that is field installed. Photosensors could be similarly added for control of fixtures mounted over spaces that receive ample daylight from skylights.

Light levels can be stepped using a single ballast called a step dimming or light level switching ballast. If the existing space is already circuited for bilevel switching, step-dimming ballasts can be installed to ensure light levels are reduced uniformly, without a checkerboard pattern. These ballasts can operate without low-voltage wiring. Most products are programmed-start T8 ballasts, which may experience a loss of efficacy during light level reduction; dimming to 50%, for example, may reduce wattage by 40%. Instant-start step-dimming ballasts are available that offer proportional reductions in light output and input watts, although instant-start operation is not recommended by some manufacturers for applications with five or more ON/OFF cycles per day. Other hi/lo switching opportunities include corridors that receive a lot of daylight (with a photosensor) and stairwells (with an occupancy sensor).
Continuous-dimming ballast costs have been falling for years, putting this control method within reach of many upgrade projects. Efficiency has also improved such that dimmable ballasts are available that are as efficacious as standard instant-start fixed-output ballasts. Look for the NEMA Premium label for the most efficient ballasts.

lighting upgrades

Step-dimming ballasts provide uniform light level reduction without a checkerboard pattern. Photo courtesy of Universal Lighting Technologies.

Some dimming ballasts are available that communicate with lighting controls using existing line-voltage wiring. Two-wire phase-control dimming ballasts use existing line-voltage lines for both power and communication and are suitable for any application where greater flexibility is desired, such as conference rooms, boardrooms and private offices. A dimming range of 100-5% is available for T8 lamps and CFLs, and 100-1% for T5HO lamps. The lighting is typically controlled via local controls accessible to occupants.

Line-voltage stepped dimming (“load shedding” or “demand response”) ballasts may be combined with specialized energy management systems enabling a preset light level reduction, with a fade transition between light levels, in response to a variety of control inputs such as photosensors and schedules. The ballast may be combined with a signal transmitter that initiates load shedding in response to some type of demand response program. While demand response is still emerging as a trend, it will likely play a larger role in lighting in the future.

The ultimate control upgrade involves creating a fully realized lighting control system combining multiple strategies. In spaces where stationary tasks are performed, dimming will be preferable to switching while the space is occupied. If the ballasts will be replaced with dimmable ballasts, then multiple strategies should be enacted to make this installation more economical. When wiring a control system enacting multiple strategies around a dimmable ballast, one should consider a digital communication architecture, which eliminates multiple home runs and produces installation savings. If a digital architecture is chosen, one can consider creating a system out of DALI-compatible components, or specifying a proprietary system built around relays in distributed power packs and occupancy sensors, or digital dimming ballasts.

Finally, if the existing installation already includes automatic lighting controls that will be retained after the upgrade, ensure these controls are working properly by re-commissioning them as part of the project. The system may have been improperly designed, installed or commissioned when first put in place, or its operating parameters may have drifted out of sync with the space and how its lighting is used. Re-commissioning can therefore become a source of energy savings by itself.

The bottom line is that in most spaces, simple control strategies can be economically incorporated into lamp/ballast upgrades and fixture replacement projects, accelerating energy savings and, in some cases, improving flexibility.

Fluorescent Magnetic T12 Ballast: RIP

This month, Federal efficiency standards regulating fluorescent magnetic T12 ballasts entered their final phase, effectively eliminating these ballasts from the market, with few exceptions.

Between 2005 and 2010, efficiency standards created by Department of Energy regulations became phased into effect, covering magnetic ballasts designed to operate full-wattage F40T12, F96T12 and F96T12HO lamps.

By 2006, ballast manufacturers were no longer allowed to sell them to fixture manufacturers and fixture manufacturers were no longer allowed to sell them to the public.

As of July 1, 2010, ballast manufacturers were prohibited from manufacturing even replacement ballasts that did not meet the new standards.

Between July 2009 and July 2010, additional rules created by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 went into effect that expanded the energy standards to cover energy-saving versions of these T12 lamps (e.g., 34W F40T12 lamps).

As no ballasts meet these standards, the industry’s least-efficient fluorescent ballasts have been eliminated from the market, which will result in a shift to higher-efficiency ballasts (i.e., electronic) in existing installations. The market has already largely shifted to electronic ballasts in new fixtures but a significant number of magnetic ballasts are sold each year for replacement purposes in existing buildings. For example, according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), about 7% of the ballast market was magnetic ballasts.

Even as owners begin to upgrade existing buildings, magnetic ballasts will continue to be sold, however. These include recognized exceptions, including ballasts designed:

• for dimming to 50 percent or less of their maximum light output;
• for use with two F96T12HO lamps at ambient temperatures of -20ºF and for use in outdoor signs; or
• labeled for use only in residential applications and have a power factor of less than 0.90.

On July 14, 2012, recently enacted DOE regulations will take effect that will also eliminate the T12 lamps that the ballasts operate.

The new DOE rules expand on efficiency rules established by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 by strengthening standards for covered lamps types while also covering 8-ft. T8 lamps, 4-ft. T5 lamps and more wattages of 4-ft. T8 and T12 lamps. The net result, with few exceptions, is a majority of 4-ft. linear and 2-ft. U-shaped T12 lamps, many 8-ft. T12 and T12HO, and some low-color-rendering 4-ft. T8 lamps will be eliminated. While no longer popular in new construction, an estimated 30 percent of fluorescent 4-ft. lamps sold every year are T12, according to NEMA market data.

For more information about the law and current product availability, consult the ballast manufacturers.

California Title 20 Mandates Higher Efficiency for Metal Halide Luminaires

California Title 20California new Title 20 standards, which went into effect January 1, 2010, created new energy efficiency standards for 150-500W metal halide light fixtures used in indoor and outdoor applications. These fixtures may not be manufactured in the State of California unless they meet the new standards.

Indoor fixtures: First, no probe-start ballasts are allowed. Next, the fixture must comply with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which imposes a minimum acceptable efficiency of 88% for its pulse-start ballast.

But then Title 20 goes beyond EISA 2007, requiring one of four options.

1. Minimum ballast efficiency of 90% for 150-250W lamps and 92% for 251-500W lamps. Basically, by choosing a higher-efficiency ballast than that required by EISA 2007, the Title 20 requirement can be satisfied.

2. A ballast with an efficiency of 88% or greater AND an integral occupancy sensor with a default setting to automatically reduce lamp power through dimming by at least 40% within 30 minutes or less of an area being vacated.

California Title 203. A ballast with an efficiency of 88% or greater AND an integral photocontrol to automatically reduce lamp power through dimming by at least 40% in response to daylight contribution to light levels.

4. A ballast with an efficiency of 88% or greater AND a relamping rated wattage (stated on a permanent, pre-printed factory-installed fixture label) with only one of these four bins: a) 150-160W, b) 200-215W, c) 290-335W or d) 336-500W (if the fixture is able to operate 336-500W lamps, it must be prepackaged and sold together with at least one lamp per socket with a minimum lamp mean efficacy of 80 lumens/W.

Basically, the ballast must be even more efficient than EISA 2007 or use lighting controls. The intent appears to be to push end-users towards use of 150-500W electronic ballasts, which currently represent 2% of total HID ballast shipments, according to 2009 NEMA data. Alternately, users can stick with magnetic ballasts that offer a compliant level of efficiency or control capability. Magnetic ballasts would be most desirable for applications where electronic ballasts are not yet available or where the alternative has a form factor requiring modification of the luminaire. In addition, electronic ballasts are still proving themselves in extreme environments in which magnetic HID ballasts have already proven themselves.

Of course, there are exceptions, which negate the minimum ballast efficiency requirements for certain metal halide lighting systems if they meet any of the following conditions:

1. Luminaires that use regulated lag ballasts.

2. Luminaires that use electronic ballasts that operate at 480V.

California Title 203. Luminaires that a) are rated for use only with 150W lamps, b) are rated for use in wet locations [as specified by NEC 2002, Section 410.4(A)], AND c) contain a ballast that is rated to operate at ambient air temperatures above 50C, as specified by UL 1029-2001.

Outdoor fixtures: Same as the above, but outdoor fixtures that may comply with Option #3 must comply with at least one of the other options.

Future requirement: Starting January 1, 2015, indoor 150-500W metal halide fixtures must comply with Option #4 (wattage bin ranges) in addition to at least one of the other compliance options.

For more information, click here.

U.S. Department of Energy Issues New Lamp Efficiency Rules

In July 2009, the Department of Energy issued new energy efficiency standards for commercial general-service fluorescent lamps and incandescent (and halogen) reflector lamps. The new rules take effect July 14, 2012 and will basically eliminate products with the lowest efficiency and lowest cost. In the case of fluorescent lamps, equivalent-performance products are readily available, such as T8 lamps, and the market is expected to shift to that and other technologies. In the case of incandescent reflector lamps, only a few equivalent-performance products are readily available that comply, such as infrared-coated halogen lamps, and manufacturers are expected to develop new substitutes.

First, let’s look at the specifics of the general-service fluorescent lamp rules.

The government began regulating general-service fluorescent lamps with the passage of the Energy Policy Act of 1992. The new DOE rules expand on these regulations by making the energy efficiency standards more strict for each lamp type, while adding 8-ft. T8 lamps, 4-ft. T5 lamps and a broader range of wattages for 4-ft. T8 and T12 lamps.

The new lamp standards are summarized in Table 1. Products failing to achieve the new standards will be prohibited from manufacture in the United States. The least-efficient and lowest-cost products will be eliminated from the market—including most 4-ft. linear and 2-ft. U-shaped T12 lamps, many 8-ft. T12 and T12HO and some lower-color-rendering 4-ft. T8 lamps—resulting in fewer, higher-priced products being available.

Table 1. Summary of DOE’s 2012 standards for general-service fluorescent lamps.

Specifically, these lamp types will no longer be manufactured:

• Most 4-ft. linear full-wattage and energy-saving T12 lamps
• All 2-ft. full-wattage and energy-saving U-shaped T12 lamps
• All 75W F96T12 and 110W F96T12HO lamps
• Most 60W F96T12/ES and 95W F96T12/ES/HO lamps
• All 4-ft. T8 basic-grade 700/SP series lamps rated at 2,800 lumens
• Some 8-ft. T8 Slimline single-pin 700/SP series and 8-ft. T8 HO RDC-base lamps

Note that non-compliant products may continue to be available for some time after the regulation’s effective date, as distributors will not be prohibited from selling them and will likely continue doing so until inventories are emptied. Nonetheless, on July 14, 2012, the new baseline will be more-efficient lamps that may provide additional performance benefits such as higher color rendering and longer service life. There are many better-performing alternatives to T12 lighting, such as T8 and T5 lighting.

There are a few notable exemptions, including lamps with a CRI rating of 87 or better, lamps designed for cold-weather applications, ultraviolet lamps and some other specialty lamps. These exceptions will continue to be exempted after July 13, 2012.

Note that these rules take effect after the fluorescent magnetic T12 ballast also goes the way of the dinosaur. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 expanded earlier DOE regulations to include ballasts operating 4- and 8-ft. energy-saving as well as full-wattage T12 lamps. After June 30, 2010, manufacturers will be prohibited from making these ballasts even for replacement purposes.

Magnetic-ballasted T12 lighting had a good run, but now it’s time to step aside for younger, more-efficient technology. In the future, existing buildings will eventually likely convert to T8 lamp and ballast systems, unless they relight with new fixtures, in which case they could switch to T8, T5 or other options. This may present retrofit opportunities.

Next, let’s look at the specifics of the incandescent reflector lamp rules.

As with general-service fluorescent lamps, the government began regulating incandescent reflector lamps with the passage of the Energy Policy Act of 1992. These standards were subsequently expanded by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 and now new DOE standards that take effect in 2012 along with the fluorescent standards. The new standards, summarized in Table 2, cover reflector lamps with medium-screw (E26) bases, 115-130V, 40-205W and >2.5 in. diameter. The result is many incandescent and halogen reflector lamps (R, PAR, BR, ER, BPAR and similar bulb shapes) will be eliminated in favor of more-efficient infrared-coated halogen lamps. Additionally, 130V products, typically used on 120V systems to approximately double lamp life at a cost of 15% less light output, will also be eliminated.

Table 2. Summary of DOE’s 2012 standards incandescent reflector lamps.

Infrared-coated halogen reflector lamps—commonly designated by the abbreviation IRC (Philips), IR (Sylvania) or HIR (GE)—heat the filament, producing visible light and infrared energy. This heat is reflected back to the filament to increase its temperature, thereby increasing light output without increasing wattage, which improves efficacy. The result is a product that costs 2-3 times more than standard halogen but offers a 20-30% increase in efficacy, according to one manufacturer.

Not all infrared-coated lamps will survive, even. According to another lamp manufacturer, generally, replacements will be infrared-coated “plus” lamps or silver reflector infrared-coated lamps. Manufacturers now have three years to figure out what their new product offering will be, and will likely publish substitution guides to help lighting practitioners understand their new options.

The new DOE rule maintains the exemptions recognized by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, including 50W and lower-wattage BR30, BR40, ER30 and ER40 lamps; 45W and lower-wattage R20 lamps; and 65W BR30, BR40 and ER40 lamps. Commonly used in indoor hospitality, small business and residential applications, these exemptions are slated to expire in July 2013, per pending energy legislation.

Other options include low-voltage halogen systems, self-ballasted ceramic metal halide lamps, compact fluorescent lamps and LED lamps. For applications were 130V lamps were used, long-life lamps can be substituted. For applications requiring equivalent performance, infrared-coated lamps—which provide the benefits of easy dimming, light quality, maximum beam candlepower, instant ON, etc.—will be the new baseline.

As with the new fluorescent rules impacting available options for existing and new buildings, lighting practitioners may find it beneficial to advise their customers about the impact of the rules on lamp choices, and recommend good alternatives.

Energy Act Outlaws Many Incandescent Reflector Lamps

typical reflector lamp application

Typical application for reflector lamps covered by energy legislation. Photo courtesy of OSRAM SYLVANIA.

Reflector lamp types are directional lamps—spots, floods, etc.—popular in recessed downlighting and track lighting applications, both residential and commercial.

While general-service incandescent lamps have received the most attention in media coverage of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, with provisions beginning to take effect in 2012, many popular incandescent reflector lamps are being outlawed this month.

A variety of proven substitutes is available for eliminated lamps, including halogen, compact fluorescent and incandescent exceptions.

What the Act requires: Minimum efficacy standards established for incandescent reflector lamps by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 now apply to a larger group of reflector lamps, creating a national standard matching stricter standards enacted by nine states since 2006.

This 75W BR40 incandescent reflector lamp does not comply with EISA 2007. Photo courtesy of SYLVANIA.

This 75W BR40 incandescent reflector lamp does not comply with EISA 2007. Photo courtesy of SYLVANIA.

In short, the Act covers incandescent and halogen reflector lamps greater than 2.25 inches in diameter, including R, PAR, BPAR, BR (BR30, BR40) and ER (ER30, ER40) lamps.

After the effective date (June 16, 2008 is the intended effective date, say manufacturers), these lamp types will have to demonstrate a minimum efficacy, expressed in lumens of light output per watt of electrical input (lumens/W) as shown in Table 1, or no longer be manufactured in the U.S.

EISA requirements for reflector lamps

Table 1. EISA 2007 requirements for incandescent reflector lamps.

Typical application for reflector lamps covered by energy legislation. Photo courtesy of Philips Lighting.

Any product manufactured prior to the effective date, even if it does not meet the Act’s requirements, may continue to be sold until inventories are depleted.

Exceptions: Exemptions include <50W BR30, BR40, ER30, ER40; <45W R20; and 65W BR30, BR40 and ER40 lamps.

Analysis: According to Brian Vedder, product manager-halogen fro Philips Lighting, the most popular lamps being eliminated include 50W and 75W R20 and 85W BR30 lamps, and the most popular exceptions are 65W BR30 and BR40 lamps. According to Vedder, colored lamps and lamps designed for “vibration service” or “rough” applications are also exempt.

EISA-compliant reflector lamps

Consumer demand is expected to shift to halogen lamps such as these EISA-compliant bulbs. Photo courtesy of SYLVANIA.

Consumer demand is expected to shift to halogen lamps such as these EISA-compliant bulbs. Photo courtesy of SYLVANIA.

Lamp manufacturers have begun publishing substitution guides to help distributors navigate compliant alternatives for lamps being phased out. Substitutions include halogen, compact fluorescent and incandescent exceptions. Tables 2 and 3 provide several examples. Note, however, that dimmable compact fluorescent products available at the time of writing exhibited performance issues during dimming, which may disqualify compact fluorescent for applications involving dimming.

Table 2. Examples of substitutions recommended by GE Lighting.

Table 3. Example: 75W BR40 incandescent reflector lamp and its nearest substitutions recommended by OSRAM SYLVANIA.

2007 Energy Law Eliminates Sale of Probe-Start Metal Halide Fixtures

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 contains significant provisions affecting the sale of metal halide lighting fixtures.

Starting in 2009, 150-500W metal halide lighting fixtures must contain ballasts that operate at a certain level of efficiency, virtually eliminating probe-start lamps and ballasts from new fixtures.

This provision of the 2007 Energy Act essentially makes a Federal standard of efficiency requirements already enacted in California, New York, Arizona, Oregon, Rhode Island and Washington.

What the law says

EISA 2007 regulates the efficiency of ballasts in new lighting fixtures containing 150-500W metal halide lamps.

Starting January 1, 2009, new metal halide lighting fixtures cannot be manufactured or imported unless their ballast operates the lamp at a minimum efficiency level as shown in Table 1. Compliant fixtures will contain a capital E printed in a circle on their packaging and ballast labels (similar to legislated fluorescent ballasts).

Exceptions include fixtures with regulated lag ballasts, fixtures with electronic ballasts for operation at 480V, and 150W wet-location fixtures containing a ballast rated to operate at ambient temperatures above 50°C.

This Federal law covers manufacture and not sale, so distributors will be able to sell their inventories of non-compliant fixtures until they are depleted (unless prohibited by state law). The law covers fixtures and not ballasts, so distributors will also be able to continue selling non-compliant ballasts to customers for spot replacement needs in existing installations.

Table 1. Minimum metal halide ballast efficiency levels mandated by EISA 2007. Efficiency is measured as Pout/Pin where Pout is the lamp wattage and Pin is operating wattage.

Impact

Probe-start magnetic ballasts for metal halide lamps up to 400W will be virtually eliminated from new fixtures. Because probe-start lamps require probe-start ballasts, this will also eliminate 175-400W probe-start metal halide lamps from new fixtures.

Demand will shift to pulse-start. Note,however, that while many pulse-start magnetic ballasts comply with EISA 2007, a significant number do not, so look for the compliance symbol on the ballast label and fixture packaging.

Meanwhile, most, if not all, pulse-start electronic ballasts comply, so it is expected that electronic ballasts, including dimming versions, will get a boost.

In recent years, pulse-start lighting systems have been making significant advances against traditional probe-start in higher wattages.

Pulse-start systems produce higher light output than traditional probe-start systems both initially and over time, operate more efficiently, produce whiter light, provide good lamp-to-lamp color consistency, and turn on and re-strike faster. In terms of energy efficiency, pulse-start metal systems can provide up to 25% energy cost savings in existing applications over probe-start, and up to 30% savings in capital and operating costs in new construction.

So the law is essentially accelerating the phase-out of an obsolete technology in favor of readily available, better-performing, more-efficient technologies.

Specialty mercury vapor systems

While on the subject of HID lighting, EISA 2007 also includes a little-known provision that updates previous legislation impacting mercury vapor ballasts.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 prohibited manufacturing and importing mercury vapor ballasts starting January 1, 2008. The law intended to target standard systems but inadvertently targeted specialty systems as well.

EISA 2007 includes two technical corrections:

First, mercury vapor lamps are defined as featuring screwbases, so manufacturers can still produce ballasts to operate uniquely based lamps used in applications such as UV curing and chip manufacturing.

Second, if a standard screwbase mercury vapor lamp is to be used in a specialty application, the ballast’s label must include the notice, FOR SPECIALTY APPLICATIONS ONLY, NOT FOR GENERAL ILLUMINATION, as well as its intended specialty applications.

Congress Extends Commercial Buildings Deduction to 2013

The Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005 created the Commercial Buildings Deduction (CBD), which established an accelerated tax deduction rewarding investment in energy-efficient interior lighting, HVAC/hot water systems and building envelope.

Initially set to expire December 31, 2007 and then December 31, 2008, the CBD was recently extended by Congress to expire in five years: December 31, 2013.

The Deduction
A tax deduction is a cost subtracted from adjusted gross income when calculating taxable income; tax liability is not reduced dollar for dollar, as is the case with a tax credit, but instead in proportion to the taxpayer’s tax bracket.

Deducting the cost of a capital investment such as new lighting is not special. What is special about the CBD is the owner can potentially write off the entire cost of the new lighting in the tax year in which it is placed in service, instead of capitalized and depreciated or amortized over time. So it’s an accelerated tax deduction: If a cost item associated with installing new lighting is normally depreciated and claimed over a period of years, it can now be claimed in a single tax year.

The CBD essentially has two levels depending on whether one wants to achieve savings targets for the entire building—interior lighting, HVAC/hot water and building envelope—or each of these systems individually. And the Interim Lighting Rule, which was supposed to be in effect only until the partial deduction rules were written, is still in effect.

The Interim Lighting Rule does not require special software or building energy modeling and is therefore relatively simple to implement, so we will focus on this part of the CBD in this article.

Click here to learn more about the complete deduction and the partial deduction rules.

The Interim Lighting Rule
The Interim Lighting Rule enables commercial building owners to deduct the full cost of new interior lighting, capped at $0.30-$0.60/sq.ft. on the sliding scale in Table 1, if the new lighting achieves a lighting power density (W/sq.ft.) that is 25-40% lower than the maximum values published in Standard 90.1-2001’s Table 9.3.1.1 or Table 9.3.1.2 (not including additional power allowances).

Commercial Buildings Tax Deduction

The exception is warehouses: The lighting system must reduce power density by at least 50% to earn a deduction of up to $0.60/sq.ft.

Both retrofit and new construction projects qualify, as long as the project is located in the United States or its territories.

Qualifying building types are listed in Table 9.3.1.1, although IRS Notice 2008-40 adds nonresidential unconditioned garage spaces to building types covered by the CBD. Houses of worship, meanwhile, do not qualify because religious organizations are tax-exempt and their buildings are not owned by the public.

So if a retrofit project in a 100,000-sq.ft. commercial office building costs $100,000 and the cost is $0.60/sq.ft., then $60,000 could be written off in the tax year the new lighting is placed in service, and the remaining $40,000 would be written off normally.

Besides reaching a reduction in power density, three other conditions must be met to qualify for the CBD under the Interim Lighting Rule:

• Install all mandatory controls and circuiting provisions in Standard 90.1-2001 (but only if a new construction or qualifying lighting alteration project, as retrofits—projects in which only lamps, ballasts and/or controls are replaced—are not covered by 90.1).
• Install bi-level switching in all occupancies except hotel and motel guest rooms, store rooms, restrooms, public lobbies and parking garages.
• Achieve the minimum recommended calculated light levels as established in the 9th Edition of the IES Lighting Handbook.

What is “bi-level switching”? Generally, bi-level switching is manual or automatic control (or a combination of the two) that provides at least two levels of lighting power in a space (not including OFF). NEMA has stated that bi-level switching typically produces 10-15% energy savings.

Multi-level switching scheme enabling 0%, 33%, 66% and 100% light and power levels. Graphic courtesy of DOE.

Dimming or switching can be used. It can be as simple as a split-ballasting system with the lighting assigned to two circuits, each controllable from a separate wall switch that is accessible to occupants (unless remote access is required for safety or security). The A/B switching can be based on alternate ballasts switching or alternate fixtures. From this basic scheme, other options become available. For example, the control can be a photosensor, occupancy sensor or input from a schedule instead of a wall switch, or alternatively dimming ballasts can be used that respond to a range of control inputs.

Also note that Standard 90.1-2001 only recognizes permanently installed lighting, so upgrading portable task lighting does not qualify as a contribution to the CBD. Similarly, the Standard exempts exit signs from interior lighting power calculations, and therefore exit sign upgrades do not qualify as a contribution toward earning the CBD.

Project Certification
For a building owner to claim the CBD, the project must be certified by a qualified individual—a contractor or engineer properly licensed as such in the jurisdiction where the building is located. The individual, who cannot be an employee of the building owner, must demonstrate in writing to the owner that he or she has the qualifications to do the certification.
According to IRS Notice 2008-40, the qualified individual must document the reduction in lighting power density in a thorough and consistent manner, with the certification including:

• Contact information for the qualified individual performing the certification.
• Address of the building to which the certification applies.
• Statement by the qualified individual that the interior lighting systems have been, or are planned to be, incorporated into the building that meet all of the requirements of the Interim Lighting Rule (suitable reduction in lighting power density, controls and circuiting in compliance with Standard 90.1-2001, etc.).

The certification must also include a statement by the qualified individual that:

• Field inspections were performed by a qualified individual after the lighting was placed in service;
• That these inspections were performed in accordance with testing procedures prescribed in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) as Energy Savings Modeling and Inspection Guidelines for Commercial Building Federal Tax Deduction (PDF) (see pages 1-2) and currently in effect; and
• These inspections confirmed the building is meeting the specified reduction in lighting power density.

The qualified individual must also provide:

• A list showing the energy-efficient lighting components and features of the building and projected power density;
• Statement that the building owner has received an explanation of the energy efficiency features of the building and projected power density; and
• A declaration: “Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this certification, including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the facts presented in support of this certification are true, correct and complete.”

The building owner should keep a copy of the certification in their tax records.

Click here (PDF) to see NEMA guidance on certification letters.

Software
Note that although IRS Notice 2006-52 (PDF) says the certification must include a statement that qualified computer software was used to calculate energy and power consumption and costs, this is not needed to demonstrate compliance with the Interim Lighting Rule. Instead, a spreadsheet or similar software can be used.

Public Buildings

If the building is government-owned (doesn’t pay taxes), the designer (“person that creates the technical specifications for installation of energy-efficient commercial building property”) can claim the CBD, according to IRS Notice 2008-40. If more than one designer is involved, the owner may allocate the CBD to the designer who was primarily responsible for the design or, at the owner’s discretion, among the designers.

More Info
NEMA created an excellent website at www.lightingtaxdeduction.org that explains the CBD.

New Energy Law to Phase Out Today’s Common Incandescent Lamps, Probe-Start Metal Halide Magnetic Ballasted Fixtures

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (HR6)

On December 19, President Bush signed H.R. 6, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, into law (Public Law 110-140).

The legislation is the result of a year-long legislative process that resulted in several modifications before congressional passage in December, and a final product that would receive White House support.

To access the complete text or an overall summary of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, click here.

This special report from the Lighting Controls Association provides a summary of the Act’s major lighting provisions:

Summary of Lighting Provisions
Goals of the Act
Sec. 321. Efficient Light Bulbs
Sec. 322. Incandescent Reflector Lamp Efficiency Standards
Sec. 324. Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures
Sec. 655. Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prizes

Summary of Lighting Provisions

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (HR6) does not include many provisions directly related to lighting. Two of its provisions, however, are nonetheless highly significant. One virtually eliminates the manufacture of today’s >150W to <500W probe-start metal halide magnetic ballasted fixtures starting in 2009 (replacement ballasts are not affected). Another virtually eliminates the manufacture of most common general-service incandescent lamps, putting billions of sockets up for grabs. The Act also has its eye on a possible LED general-service lamp in the future, establishing incentives to develop an LED product that can take on the 60W incandescent.

The Act also distinguishes itself in two other ways. One is what it does not contain, such as encouragement of more-efficient residential energy codes and any tax provisions such as an anticipated extension of the Commercial Buildings Deduction to December 31, 2013. Another is its provisions that may indirectly affect lighting, such as its tough new energy reduction requirements for Federal buildings and the establishment and funding of a Director and Office of Commercial High-Performance Green Buildings, which will work with a private-public partnership to realize a goal of all newly constructed commercial buildings being “net zero energy” by 2030.

Goals of the Act

“To move the United States toward greater energy independence and security, to increase the production of clean renewable fuels, to protect consumers, to increase the efficiency of products, buildings and vehicles, to promote research on and deploy greenhouse gas capture and storage options, and to improve the energy performance of the Federal Government, and for other purposes.”

Subtitle B—Lighting Energy Efficiency
Sec. 321. Efficient Light Bulbs

Description: The Act establishes energy efficiency standards for general service incandescent lamps by modifying applicable sections of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.

In a nutshell: Starting January 1, 2012, all general-service lamps must prove a minimum CRI, general service incandescent lamps must prove a minimum efficiency, and some incandescent lamps cannot exceed a maximum wattage. The national rules do not preclude California and Nevada from implementing regulations they created before 2008; however, these state regulations are effective only until the national rules kick in. Lamps that do not comply on or after the effective dates cannot be manufactured or imported.

Coverage: The Act defines a “general service incandescent” as:

  • an incandescent or halogen lamp intended for general service applications;
  • having a medium screw-base;
  • emitting 310-2600 lumens (40-100W with today’s wattages);
  • capable of operating within 110-130V; and
  • either a standard or “modified spectrum” lamp (technically defined by the law).

Exemptions: A number of specialty lamps are excluded, including:

  • appliance;
  • black light;
  • bug;
  • colored;
  • infrared;
  • left-hand thread;
  • marine;
  • marine signal;
  • mine service;
  • plant light;
  • reflector;
  • rough service;
  • shatter-resistant;
  • sign service;
  • silver bowl;
  • showcase;
  • 3-way;
  • traffic signal;
  • vibration service;
  • G shape with >5-inch diameter;
  • T shape of <40W and >10-inch length; and
  • B, BA, CA, F, G16-1/2, G25, G30, S and M14 lamps of <40W.

Exemption reversal condition: The Act includes a provision whereby, in cooperation with NEMA, sales of certain exempted lamps will be monitored, specifically:

  • rough service;
  • vibration service;
  • 2601-3300 lumen general service (150W);
  • 3-way; and
  • shatter-resistant lamps.

For each of these lamp types, if sales double above the increase modeled for a given year—signaling that consumers are shifting from standard incandescents to these incandescents and thereby not saving energy—the lamp type will lose its exemption.

CRI: Starting January 1, 2012, all general service lamps:

  • CFL, LED, incandescent OR halogen light source; AND
  • “used to satisfy lighting applications traditionally served by general service incandescent lamps”

… must have a minimum color rendering index (CRI) rating of:

  • 80 if not a “modified spectrum” lamp; or
  • 75 if a “modified spectrum” lamp.

Maximum wattages: The below tables show the new efficacies for general service incandescent lamps expressed as a new maximum wattage. Generally, the lamps must be 30% more efficient by 2012-2014, with larger lamps covered first.

This translates to the following efficacy ranges:

Compliance: Typical incandescent and halogen general service screw-base lamps do not comply with the new efficiency requirements. Compact fluorescent lamps comply, and LED lamps are expected to emerge as compliant alternatives in the future as well.

At the time of writing, only one incandescent/halogen product complied with the Act’s efficiency standards, which was Philips’ Halogena Energy Saver/Energy Advantage halogen screw-base lamp available in 40W, 50W and 70W versions to replace 60W, 75W and 90-100W incandescent lamps respectively, which can produce about 30% energy savings; light output may be reduced by up to about 10%. The lamps are compatible with incandescent dimmers and are rated at 100 CRI and 3,000-hour service life. The 40W and 70W models, marketed under the Halogena Energy Saver brand, are currently sold to consumers through Home Depot. The 40W, 50W and 70W models, marketed under the Halogena Energy Advantage brand, are currently sold to professionals through distribution.

In the long run, however, the CFL will eventually capture the entire market unless the incandescent can muster even greater efficiencies, as the Act requires, at a minimum, an increase in general-service lamp efficacy to at least 45 lumens/W by January 1, 2020.

No cheating: Manufacturers and sellers are not allowed to sell adapters that enable incandescent lamps without medium screw-bases to be installed into medium screw-base sockets (110-130V), thereby skirting the law.

Min. 45 lumens/W by 2020 or earlier: By January 1, 2014, when the last efficiency standards go into effect, DOE must initiate a process to determine:

  1. if any exempted lamp types should stop being exempted; and
  2. if the general-service lamp efficacy standard should be increased to 45 lumens/W—less than 60 lumens/W for today’s CFLs but still a big jump over the new minimum efficacies required by the Act.

A rule must be created by January 1, 2017, which would go into effect 3 years later = 2020. As a backstop, by January 1, 2020, unless new efficiency standards are made >45 lumens/W, all general service lamps must be at least 45 lumens/W by this date. By January 1, 2020, the process is required to repeat, with a final rule to be published by January 1, 2022 and going into effect January 1, 2025.

Candelabra- and intermediate-base incandescents: Candelabra- and intermediate-base incandescent lamps, as defined within the law, cannot exceed 60W (candelabra) or 40W (intermediate-base) maximum wattage.

Lamp labeling, market assessment, marketing, R&D, mercury reporting, analysis: The Act authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to judge the effectiveness of current lamp labeling and determine whether new lamp labeling is required to help consumers understand light level, light quality, service life and lifecycle cost.

The Act instructs DOE to conduct an annual assessment of the market for general service lamps to identify trends, efficiencies, light output levels and consumer decision-making.

The Act authorizes an appropriation of $10 million per year for fiscal years 2009 through 2012 for DOE to work with the lighting industry to implement a national program of consumer awareness and education.

The Act authorizes an appropriation of $10 million per year for fiscal years 2008 through 2013 for DOE to support R&D, demonstration and commercialization of lamps and related lighting technologies, specifically assisting general service lamp manufacturers in achieving the desired lumens/W requirements.

The Act requires DOE in cooperation with EPA to submit within a year a report to Congress with recommendations to the Federal Government to reduce or prevent mercury release during production, transportation and sale of general service lamps.

The Act requires the National Academy of Sciences to report by December 31, 2009, with an updated report by July 31, 2015, an analysis of the state of development of solid-state lighting technology, impact of a 45 lumens/W standard on different types of lighting available to consumers, and a timeframe for anticipated replacement of incandescent and halogen lighting with other lighting technologies.

Subtitle B—Lighting Energy Efficiency
Sec. 322. Incandescent Reflector Lamp Efficiency Standards

The Act establishes energy efficiency standards for incandescent reflector lamps by modifying applicable sections of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. Essentially, minimum efficacy standards established in the Energy Policy Act of 1992 now apply to a larger group of reflectorized lamps, adopting stricter standards enacted by nine states since 2006 as a Federal and therefore national standard.

The Act defines:

  • BPAR, BR (BR30, BR40); and
  • ER (ER30, ER40)

… lamps and establishes minimum lumens/W standards based on wattage, effective January 1, 2008.

Exceptions include:

  • 50W or lower wattage ER30, BR30, BR40 and ER40 lamps; and
  • 65W BR30, BR40 and ER40 lamps.

The Act also establishes minimum efficacy standards for R20 incandescent reflector lamps (with diameter more than 2.25 in. but not more than 2.75 in.) based on wattage, effective “January 1, 2008, or the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007″ (June 16, 2008).

Exceptions include 45W or lower wattage R20 incandescent reflector lamps.

incandescent reflector lamps table

Regarding the timing: OSRAM SYLVANIA reported in a technical bulletin dated January 4, 2008, "Senate and House know that the 1/1/2008 effective date is not doable for the BR, ER and BPAR lamps; however, it was too late to make a change. We are assured that a technical corrections bill will be written within the first 2 months of 2008 that changes this to 180 days after the date of enactment of the bill, which is consistent with timing afforded to manufacturers. Such technical corrections will be retroactive. We also need clarification on whether the effective dates for reflector lamps are 'manufactured by' dates, which is the case for all other lighting products in this bill." Contact the manufacturers to determine publication of substitution tables.

State action: California, Massachusetts, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington have begun regulating incandescent reflector lamps and these rules will be effective until the Federal legislation becomes effective.

Subtitle B—Lighting Energy Efficiency
Sec. 324. Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures

Description: The Act amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to create new efficiency standards and labeling rules for metal halide lamp fixtures.

Efficiency rules: Starting January 1, 2009 (or the “date that is 270 days after the date of enactment of this subsection”), lighting fixtures manufactured for operation of metal halide lamps:

  • > or equal to 150W and
  • < or equal to 500W

… must contain:

Ballast efficiency: For the purpose of the Act, efficiency is measured using this formula:

Efficiency = Pout/Pin

Where …

Pout = the measured operating wattage of the lamp
Pin = the measured operating input wattage

Exemptions: The standards do not apply to:

  • Fixtures with regulated lag ballasts;
  • Fixtures that use electronic ballasts that operate at 480V; or
  • Fixtures rated only for 150W lamps, for use in wet locations, and contain a ballast rated to operate at ambient air temperatures above 50°C.

Compliance: A review of metal halide ballasts suggests that probe-start metal halide magnetic ballasts will be virtually eliminated from new lighting fixtures after January 1, 2009. Electronic ballasts comply and so do many pulse-start magnetic ballasts. Be sure to look for ballasts that are certified to comply with the new regulation after it takes effect.

Just the fixture, not the ballast: This provision covers only newly manufactured fixtures featuring metal halide ballasts, not the ballasts themselves. (Nor does it appear to prohibit sale of existing inventories.) The replacement market is therefore not covered by this law, so owners will not be required to retrofit existing fixtures, but instead be able to continue purchasing probe-start magnetic metal halide ballasts with lower efficiencies after the enactment of this provision.

Labeling: The labeling of all metal halide fixtures manufactured on or after January 1, 2009, or “the date that is 270 days after the enactment of this subparagraph,” must contain a capital E printed in a circle on the ballast label and the fixture packaging. (The Act instructs the Federal Trade Commission to create the labeling rules by July 1, 2008.)

State action: Various states have already begun regulating metal halide fixtures which are effective until the Federal legislation becomes effective. These states include California, Arizona, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island and Washington).

Subtitle E—Miscellaneous Provisions
Sec. 655. Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prizes

Description: The Act establishes “Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prizes” for an LED replacement for today’s 60W incandescent lamps and an LED replacement for today’s PAR38 lamps, with the prize being cash and possible agreement with the Federal Government to purchase the product for all applicable Government facilities. It also establishes a “Twenty-First Century Lamp Prize” for an LED lighting product meeting certain qualifications.

Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prize – 60W Incandescent Replacement: Although DOE testing found non-directional LED lamps marketed as replacements of incandescent A-lamps to be wanting, there is significant hope that LED technology, which continues to see dramatic annual performance improvements, will eventually make a better light bulb. DOE, in fact, is willing to bet $10 million on it. To win the prize (and possible purchases by the Federal Government as a replacement for 60W incandescent lamps in all Federal Government buildings), the LED replacement lamp must:

  • produce >900 lumens;
  • draw <10W;
  • operate at >90 lumens/W;
  • have >90 CRI and a CCT of 2,750-3000K;
  • provide a minimum 25,000-hour service life (based on 70% lumen maintenance);
  • provide a light distribution pattern similar to a soft 60W incandescent A19;
  • offer a size and shape that fits within the maximum dimensions of an A19 lamp
  • use a single-contact medium screw socket; and
  • be capable of “mass production for a competitive sales commercial market satisfied by producing commercial accepted quality control lots of such units equal to or exceeding the criteria [described above].”

Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prize – PAR38 Halogen Lamp Replacement: The LED replacement lamp must:

  • produce >1,350 lumens;
  • draw <11W;
  • operate at >123 lumens/W;
  • have >90 CRI and 2750-3000K CCT;
  • provide a minimum 25,000-hour service life (based on 70% lumen maintenance);
  • provide a light distribution pattern similar to a PAR38 halogen lamp;
  • offer a size and shape that fits within the maximum dimensions of a PAR38 halogen lamp;
  • use a single-contact medium screw socket; and
  • be capable of “mass production for a competitive sales commercial market satisfied by producing commercial accepted quality control lots of such units equal to or exceeding the criteria [described above].”

The cash prize for this award is $5 million. Once a winner is selected, the Federal Government will begin purchasing it or equivalents as a replacement for PAR 38 halogen lamps in all Federal Government buildings within five years after the award is made.

Twenty-First Century Lamp Prize: A “Twenty-First Century Lamp Prize” is available to be awarded to a U.S. entrant that produces a solid-state lighting product capable of:

  • >1200 lumens of light output;
  • >150 lumens/W efficacy;
  • >90 CRI and 2800-3000K CCT; and
  • >25,000-hour service life.

The prize is $5 million.

Commercial Buildings Tax Deduction

The Commercial Buildings Deduction, created by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and extended to expire December 31, 2008 by subsequent legislation, was going to be extended to expire December 31, 2013. This provision was removed, as were all tax provisions, so as to prevent a White House veto. An extension of the Commercial Buildings Deduction is expected to be taken up when Congress returns later in 2008.

NEMA Launches New Website to Support Energy-Efficient Lighting Tax Deduction

The National Electrical Manufacturers Association’s (NEMA) Lighting Systems Division has launched a new website for owners, specifiers, installers, and sellers of lighting systems. The new website, lightingtaxdeduction.org, provides comprehensive education and implementation information about lighting upgrades covered by the commercial buildings tax deduction provision of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct).

EPAct 2005 includes a commercial buildings tax provision that provides a deduction of the cost of energy efficient systems up to $1.80 per square foot for buildings designed for 50 percent energy cost savings relative to a building designed to ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2001 Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Lighting systems, HVAC/water heating, and building envelope improvements can each qualify for up to a $0.60 per square foot deduction for their contribution to the 50 percent savings. The law allows lighting to receive up to a $0.30 to $0.60 deduction for savings in lighting power density from 25 to 40 percent respectively, with linear interpolation between 25 and 40 percent reduction. The interim lighting provision requires bi-level switching in addition to the 90.1-2001 lighting controls. Final regulations are pending from the U.S. Department of Treasury, but it should also be noted that utility and other rebate incentives can be combined with the deduction.

“This provision represents a strong incentive for building owners to reduce operating costs while increasing profitability and competitiveness by investing in available, proven, energy-efficient lighting choices,” says Brian Dundon, chairman of NEMA’s Lighting Executive Board of Directors. “NEMA estimates that this provision will result in about $500 million in additional lighting product sales. In addition, the nation will benefit from an estimated 312 MW in reduced electrical demand and an estimated reduction in national carbon emissions of 10 million metric tons.”

The website contains a wide range of frequently asked questions, process maps detailing compliance with Standard 90.1-2001, and examples of projects that demonstrate how target reductions in lighting power can be achieved. The site also provides descriptions of popular energy-efficient lighting strategies and technologies, links to research studies, a directory of NEMA Lighting Systems Division members, and additional communications resources.

“Taking advantage of deductions NEMA fought for in the 2005 Energy Policy Act represents a win-win situation for manufacturers, building owners, and the public. LightingTaxDeduction.org provides practical guidance on implementation of the commercial buildings tax deduction,” says NEMA President Evan Gaddis.

The site is a companion to efficientbuildings.org, produced by the Commercial Building Tax Deduction Coalition, which addresses incentives for efficiency improvements across HVAC/hot water, building envelope, and interior lighting systems.

The Lighting Systems Division website was developed by NEMA/WEB, the association’s web development arm. Content was provided by Craig Dilouie, principal, Zing Communications, Inc., a marketing communications and consulting firm specializing in the lighting and electrical industries. The primary mission of NEMA/WEB is to help its customers with their web development and other web-related communications needs.

NEMA is the leading trade association in the United States representing the interests of electroindustry manufacturers. Founded in 1926 and headquartered near Washington, D.C., its approximately 430 member companies manufacture products used in the generation, transmission and distribution, control, and end-use of electricity. Domestic shipments of electrical products within the NEMA scope exceed $100 billion.

Click here to visit this website.